THE AWRY SIDE OF JURISPRUDENCE
(FAILURE OF THE COURT)
Should we place it that the court of law is not a rescue center for a poor man?.
Should we characterize the court of law as dealing with possessions and not facts?
Does the court of law looks pleasing been centered on “CONVINCING” and not “TRUTHS”?
Do the court of law serve as a handicap to common man instead of a justice room?
Is the court of law really decent?
Why do the poor masses always fail in court of law because of lack of possessions?. When the rich always win because they are having influential lawyers
Why is litigation so costly, making the poor masses unable to file cases. Even when successfully make a law suit, will still loose because of not having what it takes to boost their cases?
Why will payment be made to a lawyer when asking for defense in court of law?
Why is FAILURE 100 % assured when standing without a lawyer in court of law?
Why will it be used as “WIN A CASE” oftentimes?
Why will a jurist know every truth and still defend a law breaker?
Why will the deciders know the truth and still cover up lies even to a point of hurting the innocents and comforting the guilty ones?
I thought that the court should be defending the masses equally not minding ones potential.
Why will the cops order people to remain silent when arresting them knowing that if the suspect makes his confession, it will be used as evidence and likely to bring an upright judgement.
The evil that jurists indulge in crumbles the society as it is a benefit to only the riches .
With the incidents in court of law, JURISPRUDENCE will be tagged nothing but just a GAME. Because a poor man will go to court innocent with a guilty rich man , but later will turn guilty, and the rich innocent. Meanwhile, it is claimed that the court of law is a conducive home for the persecuted.
The payments made to jurists when seeking their assistance by the court parties, brought the whole issue of lost of trust in court of law.
The impossibility in winning a case without a lawyer contributes to the suffocation of the common man in court of law because court never considered the fact that it involves money which many people can not afford due to the process of litigation and other issues that lies on their shoulder.
Even the often used word “WIN A CASE” describes it as “BEING ABLE TO CONVINCE” and not “SEEKING THE TRUTH”.
The high cost of litigation is so harmful that it makes the poor unable to make a suit and keep been under the sorrow they are suffering from the offence unleashed on them.
The issue could be claimed as the no.1 problem that destroyed not only Africa but the World as a whole. It is quite disgusting that some cases will be taken to the law court, and instead of proper investigation for justice to prevail, the lawyers of the parties will remain on mere debate to generate convincing stories to win the case.
What brought all this problems is what am still trying to figure out because it seems the government have a hand on it. They are in, to protect and provide for everyone and not dividing the rich and the poor, neglecting the poor and supporting the rich.
Until the court of law ameliorates, there will never be much heartly regard and respect by everyone to it, and anarchy, chaos and doom will rule over the world.
EZE DIVINE ILOABUCHI