Baskadia

ホンマにアホやなぁ！（１４）

４、結果の分析と考察

　この結果によると、サンプルが７個では有意差の検定が出来ない。しても、意味がない。また、

１、私が受験慣れした。

２、受験、資格、ネイティブの訳し分けが曖昧。

３、年度、学部による難易度、採点の厳しさの違い。

　などの変動要因が考えられて、単純に「ネイティブ英語が最も評価される」と結論づけられないかもしれない。

　しかし、この調査結果と京大教授の置かれた状況ーつまり、英語で論文を発表して評価されなければならない状況ーを考慮に入れるとどうなるだろう。

　三重県の人口５万人程度の小さな塾の塾長である私が指導したら京大医学部、阪大医学部、名大医学部などに合格者が出た事実も考慮に入れたらどうだろう。私はネイティブ英語に変えて書くべきだと指導している。

4. Analysis and Discussion of Results

　According to the results, it is not possible to test for significant differences with a sample size of 7. Even if we did, it would be meaningless. 

 

1, I was familiar with the examination.

2, The translation of exam, qualification, and native is ambiguous.

3, Differences in difficulty level and severity of scoring by year and department.

 

　It may not be possible to simply conclude that "native English is the most highly rated" due to possible variable factors such as the following.

 

　However, what would happen if we take into account the results of this survey and the situation in which the Kyoto University professor was placed - that is, the situation in which he had to present his paper in English and be evaluated?

　What if we also take into account the fact that I, as the president of a small cram school in Mie Prefecture with a population of about 50,000, have taught students who have passed the Kyoto University School of Medicine, Osaka University School of Medicine, and Nagoya University School of Medicine? I am instructing you that you should change to native English and write in it.