Baskadia

In the realm of artificial intelligence, finding your stance is no easy feat. The question looms large: will AI save humanity or lead to our destruction? Even the world's foremost experts remain divided on this issue.

Some AI creators advocate for a slowdown or even a pause in development due to the breakneck pace of evolution. Conversely, others argue that such a halt would stifle its potential to revolutionize fields like medicine and climate solutions.

This week, a gathering of approximately 100 global leaders, tech titans, academics, and AI researchers is converging at the historic Bletchley Park campus in the UK, once home to World War Two codebreakers. Their objective is to deliberate on how to harness the benefits of this potent technology while mitigating its risks.

The AI Safety Summit in the UK focuses on the daunting threats posed by "frontier AI," the most advanced systems, which are rapidly advancing. Critics assert that the meeting should shift its attention to the immediate concerns of AI, such as its energy consumption and its impact on employment.

A recent UK government report has outlined alarming potential risks, including bio-terrorism, cyber-attacks, autonomous AI control, and the proliferation of deepfake images depicting child exploitation.

Interestingly, despite this ominous backdrop, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak remains resolute, unveiling an ambitious plan to establish the UK as the global leader in AI safety.

When the summit was initially announced, it raised eyebrows. Would global leaders heed the UK's call and convene in a remote corner of England during the winter cold, near the US Thanksgiving holiday?

While the official guest list remains undisclosed, it is evident that major US tech firms will have a substantial presence. Their enthusiasm is undeniable, as Stability AI's Emad Mostaque heralded the summit as a "once-in-a-generation opportunity" for the UK to become an AI superpower.

Yet, diversity of thought is essential, as these firms are at the forefront of AI development, shaping the future of the technology.

The international contingent is diverse. US Vice-President Kamala Harris is attending, while Canadian PM Justin Trudeau is not. European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen is confirmed, but German chancellor Olaf Scholz won't be present. China's invitation is controversial, given its complex relationship with the West, yet it undeniably remains a tech superpower.

United Nations Secretary General Antonio Guterres's participation is intriguing, reflecting the growing calls for global oversight of AI.

Critics argue that the summit may have misplaced its priorities, as the risk of extreme doomsday scenarios is relatively small compared to more immediate concerns, such as job displacement and societal impact.

The energy consumption of the AI sector is set to rival that of a small country in just four years, but this issue is not on the summit's agenda.

AI is already causing job disruptions, exemplified by AI tools in the Department for Work and Pensions expediting benefits claims.

The concern over AI's data and potential bias is acknowledged but takes a back seat to other summit discussions.

As the summit unfolds, what can we expect? A miraculous "Bletchley Park Agreement" might not be in the cards, but the mere assembly of these influential figures is a triumph in itself, as the government asserts. Professor Yoshua Bengio, one of the founding figures of AI, suggests a registration and licensing system for frontier AI models that can be revoked if deemed unsafe, recognizing that such a complex initiative will take more than two days to formulate.

In the grand scheme, he urges starting with practical steps, emphasizing that international treaties and agreements will require more time. The path forward lies in taking small yet decisive strides, rather than waiting for an intricate global governance system to emerge.